Everyday Hybridity

Dr Paul O'Connor
Sociology/Cultural Studies/Anthropology
Hong Kong/Ethnicity/Everyday Life
Lecturing in Anthropology at CUHK

Author of "Islam in Hong Kong: Muslims and Everyday Life in China's World City"
Hong Kong University Press 2012


This blog discusses my research on Muslims, religious minorities, and ethnicity in Hong Kong. It also looks at social theory, and everyday life academia, issues of multiculturalism, racism in Hong Kong, visual culture, skateboarding culture, and prefigurative politics.

contact: Dr Paul O'Connor
everydayhybridity@gmail.com
http://uq.academia.edu/PaulOConnor
twitter.com/peejayohhsee

pages

The Book
Ethnicity in Hong Kong Survey
Connections
My Publications
What is Everyday Hybridity?

tumblinks

search

free counters
Free counters

powered by tumblr
seattle theme by parker ehret

  1. Hong Kong not so racist after all
Over the weekend I was called up to make a comment on this story for the SCMP. Whilst on the run I said that I didn’t think it was a fair reflection on Hong Kong as it is today. Now the news notes the statistics were wrongly assessed. We have some reflection here.
So now people are thinking Hong Kong isn’t that racist. It again seems that  so much quality information is lost in the fumble for quick statistics and soundbites. As academics we spend a painstaking amount of time trying to give a balanced insight into the data available to us. We strive not to make kneejerk reactions and we tend to agonise that our comments are being taken too generally.
In the social media age, with tweets and blog postings, the visibility of the academic is encouraged. Yet like quick-to-the-press stories, we must strive to maintain credibility. Having a bang up to date media that is constantly reacting to second and third hand stories is not as valuable as having information you can rely on.

    Hong Kong not so racist after all

    Over the weekend I was called up to make a comment on this story for the SCMP. Whilst on the run I said that I didn’t think it was a fair reflection on Hong Kong as it is today. Now the news notes the statistics were wrongly assessed. We have some reflection here.

    So now people are thinking Hong Kong isn’t that racist. It again seems that  so much quality information is lost in the fumble for quick statistics and soundbites. As academics we spend a painstaking amount of time trying to give a balanced insight into the data available to us. We strive not to make kneejerk reactions and we tend to agonise that our comments are being taken too generally.

    In the social media age, with tweets and blog postings, the visibility of the academic is encouraged. Yet like quick-to-the-press stories, we must strive to maintain credibility. Having a bang up to date media that is constantly reacting to second and third hand stories is not as valuable as having information you can rely on.

     
     
  2. Back to the old question, ‘why are Hong Kong people so racist?’

    This articles gives an overview about the basics but doesn’t get to the key issue. One of the reasons people in Hong Kong are so prejudiced towards other ‘races’ is because they are perceived to come from poorer countries. They are considered less wealthy, less educated, and less cultured. It tends to be the case that we are prejudiced towards others when we believe that they are unlike, or opposed to us. This is one of the reasons Hong Kongers have such a prejudice towards different races.

    What is so intriguing about this study is that it paints a very poor picture of Hong Kong. Yet one of the things people value and admire about Hong Kong is its freedom and safety. So whilst people in Hong Kong might hold these values, racial crime is all but not existent. people do not get attacked in the street because of their ethnicity or sexuality. There therefore needs to be much greater scrutiny of studies such as this. Who do they suggest are the most tolerant? The US, Australia, and Northern Europe. Let us ask if that really is the case. Do we really need to look at how diverse living conditions are in the UK or in US cities? Platitudes about saying who you want to live next to, they say very little about how much individuals really mix, and how they behave when they do.

     
     
  3. Bauman Posits Solidarity
An interesting, and optimistic article by Bauman on solidarity In Eurozine. It covers some very familiar terrain, but at the same time we see Bauman venturing a little further with ideas about how to tackle our contemporary problems. He notes…

Do you want solidarity? If so, face and get to grips with the routine of the mundane; with its logic or its inanity, with the powers of its demands, commands and prohibitions. And measure your strength against the patterns of daily pursuits of those people who shaped history while being shaped by it.

Highlighting that there are some serious challenges for us as liquid modern beings, to actually cope and deal with the dullness of commitment to political change. Our solidarity comes with the burden of the mundane.
Setting out a schema for what we do need for solidarity, he turns to Richard Sennett, who has proposed ‘informal, open-ended, co-operation’. This strikes me as being very much aligned with the notion of prefigurative politics. The focus being on the method, rather than the result. Bauman also leaves us with the notion that co-operation, solidarity, and functioning community, all leave us with increased knowledge. We become enriched not because of what we gained, but because of what we experienced. Wisdom becomes knowing how little you know.

    Bauman Posits Solidarity

    An interesting, and optimistic article by Bauman on solidarity In Eurozine. It covers some very familiar terrain, but at the same time we see Bauman venturing a little further with ideas about how to tackle our contemporary problems. He notes…

    Do you want solidarity? If so, face and get to grips with the routine of the mundane; with its logic or its inanity, with the powers of its demands, commands and prohibitions. And measure your strength against the patterns of daily pursuits of those people who shaped history while being shaped by it.

    Highlighting that there are some serious challenges for us as liquid modern beings, to actually cope and deal with the dullness of commitment to political change. Our solidarity comes with the burden of the mundane.

    Setting out a schema for what we do need for solidarity, he turns to Richard Sennett, who has proposed ‘informal, open-ended, co-operation’. This strikes me as being very much aligned with the notion of prefigurative politics. The focus being on the method, rather than the result. Bauman also leaves us with the notion that co-operation, solidarity, and functioning community, all leave us with increased knowledge. We become enriched not because of what we gained, but because of what we experienced. Wisdom becomes knowing how little you know.

     
     
  4. I am currently reading Liquid Surveillance by Zygmunt Bauman and David Lyon. It is another one of Bauman’s conversational books where we read a dialogue, this time between him and Lyon. This format actually works quite well in this debate as Lyon tries to lead Bauman into areas where he has not made unambiguous declarations. Such forays aren’t always as successful as one would hope, alas we are fascinated by Bauman not because of what he doesn’t say but because of what he does say.
The points I wanted to make about this text resonate with its focus on technologies of surveillance. From an academic point of view the development of the network as something more important than community is really key. The Social Sciences are paying serious attention to social networking sites, but it almost seems that there needs to be an overarching  critical academic approach to it. something like ‘networkology’, that works with the foundations provided by sociology, anthropology, psychology and media and cultural studies, and then uses it to take account of how central social networking and media sites are in everyday life.
Bauman makes the point that the network is not like community, there isn’t a shared outlook, or similar geography, a shared culture or national perspective. Think of your Facebook friends or your Tumblr followers, you are the only thing that all of them share in common. Accordingly with such fragile ‘liquid’ bonds, network nodes work with a shady individualisation. The truth of the matter is that they are a series of disconnections that can be interconnected, but need not. Quoting Robert Dunbar, the human brain is suited for knowledge of up to 150 people, or 150 ‘meaningful relationships’. Facebook friends are thus a collection of acquaintances, unknowns, old friends, and intimates, muddled up with family too. Sharing information with such a vast array of people models an uneasy truth about the world…we know that we readily give ourselves over to methods of DIY surveillance, our phones, our loyalty cards, our Facebook accounts, but at the same time the fear is not ‘big brother is watching you’, it is the fear of exclusion, of being redundant, wasted, or forgotten that haunts the contemporary denizens of Bauman’s liquid modern world. This visibility is key and the network (both virtual and real world) is now tended with greater care than our community and cultural ties.
There is much more to this book. Some excellent debate on drones, remote surveillance, and even some revisiting of concepts from Modernity and the Holocaust. Notions of the value of technology, of the capacity for it to reflect human strengths and weaknesses, all provide stimulating reading.

    I am currently reading Liquid Surveillance by Zygmunt Bauman and David Lyon. It is another one of Bauman’s conversational books where we read a dialogue, this time between him and Lyon. This format actually works quite well in this debate as Lyon tries to lead Bauman into areas where he has not made unambiguous declarations. Such forays aren’t always as successful as one would hope, alas we are fascinated by Bauman not because of what he doesn’t say but because of what he does say.

    The points I wanted to make about this text resonate with its focus on technologies of surveillance. From an academic point of view the development of the network as something more important than community is really key. The Social Sciences are paying serious attention to social networking sites, but it almost seems that there needs to be an overarching  critical academic approach to it. something like ‘networkology’, that works with the foundations provided by sociology, anthropology, psychology and media and cultural studies, and then uses it to take account of how central social networking and media sites are in everyday life.

    Bauman makes the point that the network is not like community, there isn’t a shared outlook, or similar geography, a shared culture or national perspective. Think of your Facebook friends or your Tumblr followers, you are the only thing that all of them share in common. Accordingly with such fragile ‘liquid’ bonds, network nodes work with a shady individualisation. The truth of the matter is that they are a series of disconnections that can be interconnected, but need not. Quoting Robert Dunbar, the human brain is suited for knowledge of up to 150 people, or 150 ‘meaningful relationships’. Facebook friends are thus a collection of acquaintances, unknowns, old friends, and intimates, muddled up with family too. Sharing information with such a vast array of people models an uneasy truth about the world…we know that we readily give ourselves over to methods of DIY surveillance, our phones, our loyalty cards, our Facebook accounts, but at the same time the fear is not ‘big brother is watching you’, it is the fear of exclusion, of being redundant, wasted, or forgotten that haunts the contemporary denizens of Bauman’s liquid modern world. This visibility is key and the network (both virtual and real world) is now tended with greater care than our community and cultural ties.

    There is much more to this book. Some excellent debate on drones, remote surveillance, and even some revisiting of concepts from Modernity and the Holocaust. Notions of the value of technology, of the capacity for it to reflect human strengths and weaknesses, all provide stimulating reading.

     
     
  5. We cover some pretty interesting ideas in my Anthropology of the Body Love and Emotion class. This last week we covered the issue of the body online and technologically mediated sex. We looked at the LovePalz teledildonics which allow a couple to maintain an intimate relationship whilst apart. The LovePalz uses bluetooth technology for you to connect rhythms with partners.

    The general consensus was that this was pretty radical, but at the same time it takes cybersex into an ambiguous realm of, actual intimacy, but remote. I somehow couldn’t help thinking of Woody Allen’s “Sleeper”

    But just a day after our lecture Durex launched Fundawear. It has since been covered extensively in the media. With its astute focus on foreplay rather then penetrative sex, and its launch from the ubiquitous Durex, it looks to be more popularly embraced than the LovePalz device.

    In terms of the issue of everyday hybridity it resonates with the ever closer ties we have with technology. Such interactions, this type of online intimacy is becoming somewhat prosaic. It has become an almost banal question to ask in any situation, “is there an app for that?” People already have intimate and emotional connections with their electronic devices (iPhone, laptop, television…kettle?). What one must consider is how the future of human interaction, culture and emotions will develop in an era where our relationships are normalised by disembodied intimacy?

     
     
  6. Alcohol intake in Asia. A brief infographic from the Kely Support Group.
Apparently there is a surge in binge drinking when Hong Kong’s economy is doing badly. Following the SARS pandemic I remember reading that signs the economy were doing bad correlated with two positive business developments. Beer consumption increased during an economic downturn and also the production of locally made movies with erotic undertones soared.

    Alcohol intake in Asia. A brief infographic from the Kely Support Group.

    Apparently there is a surge in binge drinking when Hong Kong’s economy is doing badly. Following the SARS pandemic I remember reading that signs the economy were doing bad correlated with two positive business developments. Beer consumption increased during an economic downturn and also the production of locally made movies with erotic undertones soared.

     
     
  7. "The messages addressed from the sites of political power to the resourceful and the hapless alike present ‘more flexibility’ as the sole cure for an already unbearable insecurity - and so paint the prospect of yet more uncertainty, yet more privatization of troubles, yet more loneliness and impotence, and indeed more uncertainty still. They preclude the possibility of existential security which rests on collective foundations and so offer no inducement to solidary actions; instead, they encourage their listeners to focus on their individual survival in the style of ‘everyone for himself, and the devil take the hindmost’ - in an incurably fragmented and atomized, and so increasingly uncertain and unpredictable world."
    — Zygmunt Bauman (2007). Liquid Times: Living in an Age of Uncertainty. Polity Press, p. 14. (via silentlucidities)
     
     
  8. Passing through Central this lunchtime and strolling through Chater garden I spotted this large Menorah. Celebrating the second day of Channukah you can see that two of the bulbs are lit along with the shamash bulb in the centre. The third will be lit tonight.
The Menorah is sponsored by the Chabad community in Hong Kong. You can visit their website here. 

    Passing through Central this lunchtime and strolling through Chater garden I spotted this large Menorah. Celebrating the second day of Channukah you can see that two of the bulbs are lit along with the shamash bulb in the centre. The third will be lit tonight.

    The Menorah is sponsored by the Chabad community in Hong Kong. You can visit their website here. 

     
     
  9. Whatever Happened to the Islamists? Salafis, Heavy Metal Muslims, and the Lure of Consumerist Islam.
An interesting new book that I am going to have to get hold of. I have followed the work of Amel Boubekeur for a number of years. She has written some excellent articles on “cool Islam” and the repackaging of Islam in commercial products.
This edited collection follows with those themes.
Available on Amazon and here through Columbia UP.

    Whatever Happened to the Islamists? Salafis, Heavy Metal Muslims, and the Lure of Consumerist Islam.

    An interesting new book that I am going to have to get hold of. I have followed the work of Amel Boubekeur for a number of years. She has written some excellent articles on “cool Islam” and the repackaging of Islam in commercial products.

    This edited collection follows with those themes.

    Available on Amazon and here through Columbia UP.

     
     
  10. These pictures of a variety of skaters, some well known, some less well known, come from a blog called the Skatorialist. Little information is on the blog, but it is run by photographer Sam Ashley.

    The title of the blog is a neologism and portmanteau. The emphasis being on fine tailoring and skateboarding.

    I have been preparing for a course on the experience of the body in human culture. One thing that I have been looking at is our engagement with the world through material objects that in some ways become part of our physical experience.

    Simply think of your phone.

    For skateboarders there is similarly an experience with the board. How could one describe this? Perhaps a fifth limb? Or for those familar with the “His Dark Materials”, a dæmon? It might be described as relational but extrabodily.

    Well this blog juxtaposes the two elements. without the boards, these are just people, with the boards they are given a different context and meaning. Skateboards have long been used as fashion accessories. It always seems bizarre to me. Probably because it always looks so false. Yet these photos strike a different chord to the fashion pictures. There seems to be something very simple here, but also honest. Perhaps in these pictures the camera has captured that enigmatic relationship between board and person. Between body and object.

    (Thanks to Joey for the tip)